Preface Legal remedy measures to sell real estate under execution enforcement provide a strict but orderly process that the judgment creditor may follow in order to satisfy its judgment. However, judgment creditors consider the process to be too complicated, sometimes making expenses outright in light of the uncertain outcome of legal proceedings.
In this article we will explain the use of recipients nominated by the court to sell real estate as an alternative to statutory execution sales. Using a recipient appointed to the court to sell real estate provides a number of obvious benefits over executive sales.
- Real estate is often sold under orders that appointed recipients, at the same time (or less) as the first run by creditors' selling and selling (ie about 5 months);
- When a recipient is appointed, he will do all the necessary procedures to complete the sale with the necessary effort from the creditors. And
- The beneficiary can sell the real estate in the open market through the real estate agent and realize the highest revenue possible.
Despite the obvious benefit, the appointment of the recipient is considered a "dramatic relief". Many courts do not allow appointment of recipients unless there is a polite situation or "good cause".
- The previous sale to real estate failed.
- The net amount expected from executive sales does not satisfy the complete judgment.
- Third parties of non-obligors are interested in the subject property.
- The real estate also includes the resident business to be executed against the interests of the judicial debtor.
- The judgment debtor orders the appointment of the beneficiary to obtain the greatest value of the property applicable to the jurisdictional area. Egypt
- There are other circumstances where the transfer of real estate was made or threatened, or which indicates fraud or disappearance of assets.
In the most common terms, moving parties need to be prepared to indicate the following things.
- A less drastic remedy provided by law is inadequate and the appointment of the recipient will substantially improve the outcome. Or
- Recipients need to retain the interests of all stakeholders, especially if an external third party is interested in the real estate or if there is a "fraud badge".
The purpose of this article is to help "make a case" for reserving receivers under your specific circumstances. The hint provided here is designed to help create a "good cause" necessary to convince this "thorough relief" is necessary and appropriate in your specific jurisdiction enforcement case It has been.
The reality of execution California Provides a clear and orderly process for selling real estate under enforcement warrants. Civil action §§ 701.510, et. seq. This method has some important safeguards for the embedded debtor.
- Personal service of notice to obligor.
- Opportunities for the debtor to respond.
- A title report or equivalent is obtained and reviewed.
- Fair market value and farmer exemption are determined.
- The debtor was given a minimum of 120 days from notification to sale. And
- Homestead property should sell at least 90% of the determined fair market value.
Due to this process constraint, there are many reasons why credit creditors can not finally get satisfied. Please consider the following general problem.
- Cash is required for the execution method. At the moment, buyers who have cash are looking for transactions that are above 10% under fair market value
- A buyer can not walk around and inspect the property before shopping.
- If there is a mistake in the process, you need to start the process again
- This sale has a lack of general public market interests such as listings on multiple listing services, aggressive marketing by licensed real estate agents, buyer's ability to be financed, inspected and repaired .
- Sheriffs or collecting officers have many responsibilities and can not spend considerable time in order to guarantee the sale or other "special attention" to be completed.
The appointment of the recipient may provide some satisfaction in your case if you are in a situation where you have executed an executive sale without success.
Real world case in point: The author was appointed as a recipient when selling a detached house purchased using $ 40,000.00 for income from fraudulent relocation. The house was valued at $ 241,000.00. This means that it was sold for only $ 216,900.00 at executing sales ($ 241,000.00 x 90%). The house was actually sold for $ 259,000.00 in a private open market far exceeding the value actually appraised. The difference was sufficient to absolutely cover the recipient's fee and expenses. Real estate agency & # 39; responsibility, and make some minor repairs and to pass pest inspection. At $ 40,000 paid to the creditors, the homeowner was entitled to the remaining procedures. Including expenses, owners may have lost more than $ 25,000.00 if they are sold on executive sale. Even for the creditors who got cash within five months after being listed for sale, while avoiding the severity of executive sales, it was a situation that won the victory.
Plan and evaluation
First step: Call an experienced receiver and talk about your case
As discussed above, almost all cases requiring recipient appointment involve exceptional circumstances that require special attention. Informal discussions with experienced receivers,
- Based on the facts of your specific facts check whether the appointment of the recipient is appropriate
- Reveal important points and provisions you need to include in your application and order
- It helps to plan timeline for appointment of recipient, decision of recipient's obligation, acquisition of trustee's goal
Probably not. The court will judge that the statutory way to regulate the sale of real estate is most likely to provide "proper relief". If this is compared with "drastic remedial action" deemed to be received, the moving party must prove that the legal method is "inadequate" or that "thorough relief" is legitimate It will not.
Make your case unique The legal 'proper relief' covers all situations in which real estate is theoretically sold in order to satisfy the judgment. In reality, we can argue that legal measures are "allocated" under certain circumstances. It is therefore important to show that your case is unique. It is different from all other cases where legal remedies are said to be "proper". At the time of evaluating the case, it turned out that a special circumference was applied to the recipient's warrant reservation.
Previous sale to property failed to sell The most obvious way to show that legal remedies are inadequate is to show that it was attempted and failed. If you can display this, please tell the fact to the court in a completely succinct manner. Expenses have expired. Display the date and calculate the delay. If there are other circumstances that affect the credibility of the sheriff's sale, such as discreet sheriff's department or previous errors, it also needs to be dealt with carefully.
Net value from Execution Sale does not satisfy complete verdict In the previous real world example, the recipient was able to sell the property for more than $ 40,000, more than $ 40,000 higher than the appraisal value and 90,000% higher than the low running price. Use the same number as the previous example ($ 241,000.00 valuation) and consider the difference for $ 240,000.00 or higher. At 90% sale by law enforcement, approximately $ 215,000.00 The debtor is walking without doing anything. Probably unsecured, there is a $ 25,000 reminder. Using a recipient increases the likelihood of selling property over a reasonable fair market value. The end result is to increase the likelihood of judgment, perhaps complete satisfaction, and the likelihood that the debtor will walk with some money.
Third party of non-obligor has interest in target property
In rare circumstances, situations may arise where the debtor owns land ownership jointly with another person who is not liable for debt. In addition to the interests of the debtor and creditors, the court must now be interested in the interests of innocent third parties. Ninety percent of the fair market value is legal and may be acceptable for the sale of the property of the debtor, but third parties do not need to receive significant discounts on their property. Because the recipient can get the highest price of the property, third parties can make up their profits appropriately.
Real estate includes enforcement housing business
If there is a particularly great dispute with the business in the property owned, appoint a recipient who systematically manages the sale of business and property as a continuous concern to maximize value and to protect from fraud can do.
Judgment debtor orders appointment of recipient
As previously discussed, recipients are more likely to generate greater net gains from the sale of property than on executive sales. Of course it may be possible for the debtor to simply sell the house and negotiate paying the judgment on its income. However, if it is shown that it is beneficial for the debtor, the designated appointment of the recipient may be possible.
Property transfer was done or threatened Election of recipients in case of fraudulent transport is explicitly stipulated in California State law. Civil Code ง 3439.07 (a) (3) (B). In fact, the use of recipients as rescue means of illegally transferred real estate is limited to cases where income from real estate occurs, when maintenance is necessary, or when the risk of waste situations where property needs protection It can be executed in some cases. Of course, if the main purpose is to liquidate the real estate, you can also select the administrator based on the points discussed elsewhere in this article. The main goal is to safely and successfully liquidate the property for maximum net profit.
Display privileges for private open market sales by recipients In the first opinion, the recipient appointed to the court may not seem to have the authority to sell real estate to satisfy the judgment. In fact, the Code of Civil Procedure § 568.5 is the only legal authority to deal with the sale of genuine or individual property by a recipient nominated by the court, and the recipient is the civil action provision §§ 701.510, et. seq.
From the outset, you can appoint a recipient to make a decision based on the clearly established authorities of §§ 564 (b) (3) and 708.620 of the Civil Procedure Code.
Next, the comments of the Legislative Committee of the Code of Civil Procedure § 568.5 and certain incident authorities, People v. Riverside University (1973) 35 Cal. App. 3d 572, 111 Cal. Rptr. 68 (The court may allow recipients to sell property either private or public) Cal-American Income Real Estate Fund VII v. Brown Development Co., Ltd. (1982) 138 Cal. App. 3d 268, 187 Cal. Rptr. 703 (If the court orders the sale of management property, the recipient is under obligation to realize the maximum amount from sales and is in the situation and interests of fairness, justice and related party's right) Court Can order a form of sales that best fits the interests of all parties. § 568.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure means that unless the court prescribes different selling methods, the recipient, if permitted, must sell the property in the manner provided for the sale at the time of sale .
Therefore, if the recipient's appointment can be shown to be a relief to serve the best interests of the parties, the authorities mentioned above will provide legal grounds and allow recipients to sell private, open market. After that, the court can concretely order to sell real estate through private open market sales using licensed real estate agents.
Show facts for understanding the necessary elements
Your motion to appoint a recipient must be supported by showing the evidence of the necessary elements. Typically, this evidence is presented in a declaration form, but other certificates such as evidence submission, deposit, review after review, evidence obtained by hearing or trial may be used.
As explained at the beginning of this article, recipient ship is a dramatic remedy that is applied cautiously only if there is a clear need for other remedies inadequate. Moran v. Upper court (1974) 38 Cal. App. 3d 347, 351, 113 Cal. Rptr. Therefore, we provide evidence that the less drastic remedies provided by the law are inadequate and that the appointment of the recipient will substantially improve the outcome.
He also said that if it is the best interest for all parties, he can also appoint a recipient to help with enforcement. Civil action § 708.620 code. Obviously, one of the main focus of this article is that the private public marketing by the recipient is likely to provide judgment satisfaction to the judgment creditors that the debtor has the damage to the real estate by the debtor If it turns out that there is a possibility of giving, it is also prudent to appoint the recipient to protect the security interest of the obligee holding the real estate.
As a matter of strategy it is important to consider arguing that the obligor is against the appointment of the recipient and that the trustee will not be in the best interest. In most cases, this is not simply a specific remedy for debtor's control measures, but due to the debtor's resistance to general execution on property. For these reasons, it is important to provide evidence and discussion that objectively presents the best interests of all parties. For example, if we can show that greater net revenue is realized through the appointment of recipients, this is objectively the best interest for both parties, debtors have less outstanding debt after sale, debtors If possible with remaining cash, you get similar sales of similar characteristics. A declaration by a qualified local real estate agent is ideal.
Please make sure that a brief explanation of the last attempt that failed in the support declaration is included with the supporting document attached as an exhibit. Also, please be sure to state the basic facts about the situation of the sentences, such as when you entered and the balance.
Finally please be sure to include evidence of fraud, disposal, avoidance, and previous attempts to block the execution of the obligor.
Conclusion In some cases, appointing a recipient to sell real estate to aid implementation can be a preferred method for creditors, as the possibility of success increases and the net benefit becomes larger. If all factors are taken into account, it can also be shown that the appointment of the beneficiary is the best interest for all parties involved, including third parties who hold interest on the debtor and some of the property . The use of the recipient nominated by the court may also be displayed in the event of damages, waste, abandonment or fraudulent exposure of property sale to dangerous threats.
Of course, the receiver is not an appropriate treatment in every situation, the main purpose of this article is to help you preliminary assessment to use the receiver in certain cases. If you consider reading this article and thinking that your jurisdiction enforcement case is likely to order appointment of the recipient, the next step is to discuss the problem with a competent lawyer. If you have a lawyer contract with an appropriate appointment of the receiving officer, please arrange a telephone conference with your lawyer and the receiving officer you are planning to appoint. By doing so, you can make effective orders by taking advantage of the recipient's experience, and the recipient can also prepare to engage in the duties immediately upon receiving the order.
EmoticonEmoticon