Disclaimer : This is a completely fictional description and has been created to relate the misfortune of reading it to the reader, in connection with the author of ordinary drying inhibition of technical writing. Ultimately, the employment lawsuit is about people and their stories .
Discrimination: betting gambling or stocking a shelf, that is a problem.
Algis stocked the shelves and checked out the customer at the local supermarket chain store. Gordon was not very sophisticated as a matter of social grace, but there was basic respect of all people taught by Lithuania's mother Lina. Lina emigrated here as a young girl, and raised Argis as a single mother. Algis grew up listening to the story that men harassed her at the job of her mother. He was not trying to bring it up by a young woman in the grocery store.
Gordon was the director of Algis. Gordon was married, overweight and desolate. Despite the smell of the body he thought he was a very attractive person. He has become a manager just one year ago. Algis has worked for a supermarket chain for nearly 15 years and I was watching that many supervisors come in and out, but Gordon was unique. Gordon clearly indicated that he felt concerned about young women workers and, when returning attention, rewarded a better schedule and promotion. However, among women, Gordon's special attention was not paid. They appealed that Gordon's "chatter" is calling for sexual aversion, and seemed to be sexually obvious over time. The woman also resented that some of the women who went with Gordon became his "favorite" while refusing to increase or promote wages.
Algis saw this interaction between Gordon and the woman from afar. The woman did not include him in his conversation about Gordon, but he could see himself what Gordon was doing, reminiscent of the man Rina explained at the table of dinner. He felt the need to report Gordon's behavior. I was surprised that he had to face directly with Gordon. He decided to report Gordon to the manager. According to the company policy, the store manager submitted a problem to Dividentalal Human Resources.Dividendal Human Resources did not investigate sexual harassment but reported some "inappropriate behavior" to Gordon My personal file "First warning".
Discrimination in the words of Walter Scott.
"Oh, how we interweave when we practice to deceive first!"
Human investors promised Algis confidentiality, but revealed to Albert that Algis was the accuser. Gordon had pretending not to know for a while, and put it "in peace" for several months to avoid being detected by the new task of removing Argis. His opportunity occurred when Algis discovered that shelf items that she had removed and did not replace had expired. Gordon prepared a long "writing" that included public health references and store reputation and warned Algis that another mistake would end. A couple of weeks later, Gordon took out expired items from the cabin and slowed down on a night when no one was watching, removed the current label and exchanged for an expired item. The next day, he conducted a shop inspection with Algis and other clerks. Gordon "discovered" the product that accused Algis, reported the violation to the store manager, and issued a firing recommendation.
After that, the manager got in touch with the regional manager, confirmed the fact, judged that the shooting was legitimate, signed off. Under our command order, the manager could not dismiss employees without review and approval by manager, regional manager, and HR manager. All three of Algis found the cause to quit.
Defense of discrimination
So when Algis sued the company for illegal retaliation, the company raised several defensive measures such as:
- Algis did not know about Algis's harassment or Algis's dissatisfaction, not a victim of retaliation, as the person making the decision was not the subject of a previous "hostile workplace environment" complaint.
- Argis was fired for good reason.
- The long time between complaints and firing was evidence that the firing was not caused by retaliation.
Since we submitted a summary judgment motion to dismiss Algis's judgment as a legal issue, I felt strongly that I can win these defenses. However, Algis' lawyer raised several lawsuits that persuaded the court to proceed lawsuits to jury trial.
Leaves v. Safeway Stores Inc. (2004) 121 Cal.App. 4 th 95, 114; Dejung v. Upper court (2008) 169 Cal.App.4th 533 and Stub v. Proctor Hospital (2011) 562 US 411.
In these cases, Algis claimed that he was able to advance the promise that he affected others with the wrong information while Gordon was the only person who was motivated to retaliate. The court agreed, according to the doctrine of "cats paw". The principle is basically regarded as completely bad if a good actor and a villain are in the closing decision process, and a bad actor influences the result.
Proof of discrimination and timing
Regarding the issue of timing of decisions, Algis's lawyer says that the extent of the case before the court has reached that time, independently, may be sufficient evidence that firing was triggered by retaliation motives. Of course, in a short period of time, the chance of causality inference increases, but there are no external restrictions set by case. The US Supreme Court stated that no external time limit is necessary to maintain causality discovery, but in the specific case before that it turned out that 20 weeks (5 months) is too long did. Clark County School District. v. Breeden, 532 US at 237-74. Into Thomas v. Beaverton City (9th 2004) 379 F.3d 802, 812, 7 Weeks did not prevent the discovery of causality even without other evidence of causation. Alas, in this uncertainty, only this is convinced: "There are things that may come, time and time runs a rough day.[Shakespeare[Shakespeare[シェイクスピア、[ShakespeareMacbeth ].
Aftermath of discretion
Algis survived the summary judgment, fought a fierce battle, got a specific jury and retaliation for coverage he recognized as "a sexually hostile work environment" was a substantial motivation for his dismissal It was found that it was a factor of attachment. This helped a bit when Algis's lawyer introduced an amazing video footage showing that Gordon switched to "an expired product" the night before the store inspection. Algis's representative received a record that received a digital timestamp from a quiet female clerk who had accepted Gordon's aversion for too long. "Everything is over," I will leave this last word. "I love everything, I trust some, I will not mistake anyone."
EmoticonEmoticon