Law enforcement agencies across the United States have special authority to fight crime. Some of these authorities are donated by federal, state, and local councils. Individual departments related to law enforcement agencies may have their own rules and rules under which laws are enforced. However, it is the court that interprets the law and issues guidelines on whether it is permitted or not.
The police station has a very heavy investigation ability and stops the crime at an early date. One of the main tools used by law enforcement officials to pursue this goal is to stop people who are suspected of engaging in criminal acts, ask questions, ask questions, and search. If an officer has sufficient confidence that an individual is committing a criminal liability or is about to commit a crime based on facts (also known as "potential causes"), that officer Temporarily grab that person for further investigation. Under established legal precedents, members are arrested while individual seizures are in a short period of time. Which causes of facts that may occur in a particular case will change significantly and cause infinite lawsuits to happen? Unfortunately, this doctrine does not allow law enforcement agencies to suspend, search and question individuals who were reported to have not been observed or engaged in criminal activity, but who were deemed "suspicious" by officers I admit it.
Thus, every year thousands of people are stopped and searched by police officers based on the police authority's claim that they acted in a suspicious manner. Suspicious actions include "swelling" under the clothes, walking from the side, "avoiding the police" as the area where the police are investigated, and so on. Some of the above activities may cause concern, but they are not criminals. However, the police will continue to use this power, overcome the vehicle, search people in public places and temporarily "take" it until the investigation is completed. Most of the people who ceased under these circumstances became happy by escaping the journey to the area of the police, but they are angry about the unfair infiltration of their freedom.
In short, without the evidence that an illegal act actually took place, the law allows law enforcement authorities to arrest people.
EmoticonEmoticon