Something is feeling miserablely wrong with your body, and you do not know what is going on? You may be suffering from Lyme disease caused by Borrelia Burgdorferi and transmitted by ticks. There is a possibility that one mite bite will cause a disaster. But it may be unlikely to notice, and even a small size may not know the tick bites.
How long does it take to recognize a new disease? 2 years? 10 years?
It took me three years to discover HIV disease. It was first observed in 1980 and was recognized in 1983. Therefore, on average, it is not reasonable for 5 years. Please do wild guess. Does it take years for modern medicine to discover lime?
In 1764, John Walker was first medically decided as a disease of pastor. In 1982, Borrelia Burgdorferi was discovered. And that alone confirmed that they are from the saliva of the tick. It took 218 years to understand what was going on. And they had modern equipment and resources.
What was the fact that HIV virus of 120 nanometer size was found 72 times earlier? Is Lyme disease spirochete 12,000 times larger than the size of HIV virus 10 micrometers?
Looking under the microscope, you can see a snake. Causes of Lyme Disease Borrelia Burgdorferi not only looks like a snake but it looks like syphilis. It was very difficult to identify microbes such as snakes.
Despite the fact that many famous people such as Guy de Maupantine, Ivan The Terian, Edouard Monet, Al Capone, Hitler, Mussolini, Cortes, Scott Joplin, Randolph Churchill and others suffered from syphilis Well, what was going on? The first syphilis was listed in 1494. It prevailed in the French army surrounding Naples. The cause of Treponema Pallidum of syphilis was found in 1913. I thought why so many famous people were infected with syphilis. Were they indiscriminate, or were they inspired by passion?
What are the similarities between Lyme disease and syphilis? However, will they cause insects like snakes? Why is it difficult to handle it? Both are great imitators.
If it is very difficult for scientists to identify limes, do you think it is easy in a regular doctor's office? No, unless you are looking for it. But, if you are thinking about it, that's easy.
Snake is dangerous, certainly. However, if you know about danger, you can protect yourself. If you get close to a snake, you can flee or kill. If you are bitten by it, you can get antiserum at any time and go well. But when you deal with lime it is not so. It is an innocent visible mite of poppy seed size chewing you. Often you do not even know about it - it's not like a snake! It is not dangerous because mites are small. It paralyzes your skin, so you will not feel a bite. How smart is that? In fact, it is also a victim of the main problem - Borrelia Burgdorpheri. It is actually a pandemic among the ticks: about 50% are infected. If you are bitten by a tick, there is a 50% chance, it is infected. The thing to be afraid is that in addition to lime, you can get other serious diseases like babesiosis and human granulocyte anaplasmosis.
Have you ever seen the bull's eyes? That is the beginning of lime. First of all, you may see what is called a "yellow eye" lesion. The dark red red ring may be indented in the middle of the mite biting place. Unfortunately, it is often not noticed. Alternatively, there may be no rash.
Immediately after the first invasion, Lyme disease begins to spread. It enters the skin, causing rashes, muscles, tendons, joints, causing pain. I also go to the heart and nervous system including the brain. You may experience symptoms such as dizziness, fatigue, depression, fibromyalgia, insomnia, palpitations, psychosomatic diseases, heart block, paralysis.
Is there a cure for this terrible disease? There should be a cure with the help of modern Western medicine and all its antibiotics. And medical researchers came up with antibiotic therapy that should soon kill the bug. It was a perfect time for them to declare victory. They did not know: Lyme disease will generate so much debate and debt that even politicians involve. This has hardly happened in medicine so far.
So what was the problem?
What if you noticed that you buy shirts and pants and that does not fit you what you do? You get another refund or another. The same happened to Lyme patients. Up to one-third of Lyme's patients did not receive better continuous treatment. They went to the doctor and said they might need additional treatment. However, antibiotics are expensive. So, medical researchers conducted four controlled double-blind trials, two of whom showed long-term treatment advantages, but two did not. What did the official medicine do?
The most respected American medical journal "New England Journal of Medicine" (NEJM) publishes a review dedicated to "chronic Lyme disease." CONCLUSION: There is no need for long antibiotic therapy, which is not scientifically justified. However, in 1999, a doctor led by Dr. Jarrno Oksi of the Department of Microbiology at Turkey University Medical School of Finnish Turku FIN - 20520, Kininariru Rin Cut No. 13 decided to see what actually happened. Treatment of Lyme borreliosis with appropriate antibiotics for more than 3 months does not necessarily eradicate spirochete (Borrelia Burgdorferi - SK). Is there a possibility that NEJM's critics have not read this article? Or did not you think that they are sufficiently important to change their minds?
Unfortunately it was not everything.
Do you remember all the bites and pimples of your mosquito last summer? of course not. 50% of patients did not remember tick bites. Remember: It looks like a poppy seed. About 50% of patients do not remember whether there is a typical bullseye rash. Therefore, they had nonspecific symptoms. It did not suggest lime.
Sounds very simple: if you do not know what it is - please complete the blood test! It is recommended that CDC first perform antibody detection test called ELISA and if positive then use another antibody to detect immunological test called western blot. If the patient can not make antibodies? Or is the genetic material different from the local type used to conduct the test? Is the sensitivity of the test low?
This may be testing you for a lime specific to your area, but it may be different from what you are testing.
Let's think about it: If you have enough antibodies to protect yourself, you can detect it. Is it some kind of disease? Since your body is fighting, there is much less possibility. But what if your body could not protect yourself? Can not make antibodies that attack bugs? Or maybe you are producing too little? You do not have weapons to protect yourself, so you really get sick. And because the lime test will be negative, we can not even even formally diagnose you with lime. It is called serum-negative Lyme disease. It is when you are really in trouble because you are sick, but your test is negative or uncertain. It's like being at a cancer point in front of an attacker. How did I deal with when George W. Bush (President of the United States) was diagnosed as looking lime in 2006? Has he received antibiotics for 21 days, or for several months? This is probably reclassified and remains a mystery.
But why so much fight? The reason why we had to establish special laws in Connecticut and Rhode Island was that doctors were doing what they thought was right for their patients and were treating them in clinical judgment. No one is excited about the number of days you can get treatment for urinary tract infections, but will anyone be absorbed in the treatment of lime?
September 2006. North Carolina courthouse. An unusual civil action was filed here. It was not a class action against a large company that I read in the Mainichi Newspaper. It was just the opposite. Major health insurance companies Blue Cross and Blue Shield or North Carolina sued a huge amount of lime of 100 million dollars for insurance fraud and prominent physician Joseph Jamsek specializing in HIV treatment. This doctor had obviously had not a lot of money because he had to go bankrupt. Not only he was unable to pay 100 million dollars, he could not afford to fight a health insurance company. But what did he do? Did he steal money from insurance? No, did he steal money from the patient? No, did he receive the rebate? They do not know.
What he did was that he was raising a lime patient according to what she thought was correct for him. He was raising a lime patient according to the recommendation of the International Association of Lyme Disease (ILADS). What insurers were looking for was to treat Lyme patients as recommended by the American Infectious Disease Association (IDSA).
But what is the difference between the two? Both are not for profit, both are made by the doctor, neither are government chapters. Differences: Recommended actions by IDSA are much cheaper, so ILADS recommends. Which insurance company do you prefer? And who do you think won?
However, health insurance companies are not always lucky.
Connecticut. a lawer office. Richard Blumenthal faces reelection in November 2006. This is Richard Blumenthal Attorney General, who introduced himself as a veteran of Vietnam not consistent with the military record of the New York Times. He is well acquainted with the patient's anger because of insurance refusal to pay a long lime treatment fee. He will meet a lime activist. It is the first time that he will meet them. In 1999 he began a hearing on Lime's long-term treatment insurance coverage. At that time, the patient won. How about now?
The health insurance company refused payment of medical expenses because the Association of Infectious Diseases (IDSA) does not recommend long-term treatment of lime. These recommendations are created by the IDSA expert panel. Also, Attorney General Blumensar looks for incentives. And here it is: Five of the 14 panel members had confidential conflicts of privacy. In addition, IDSA has prejudice appointing president, refuses to accept information on chronic Lyme disease, and has "prevented the appointment of scientists and doctors with differences in chronic lime"
You do not need any further evidence.
Complete evidence collected by Mr. Blumen was that the investigation was closed in 2008 without any complaints against IDSA. However, IDSA promised to revise Lyme's recommendations. And they issued a new recommendation in 2010. Do you think that there was a change? You are welcome.
According to IDSA, they spend close to a million dollars, revising guidelines and legal fees. Where did I get such a huge amount from? Who paid for this? doctor? Anyone else?
However, in 2009, in Connecticut and Rhode Island, we protected physicians from sanctions for long Lyme disease treatment, making them easier for doctors and patients.
What is the reason why such serious disagreement arises between IDSA and ILADS Lime Expert? It is illegal for me to have prejudice against all experts. Because they became doctors to help people. This is the nature of a doctor. Or maybe the difference in opinion that the health insurance company used to make a profit?
There is no mistake in the difference of opinion. This is human nature. It seems to be a difference between religion and science. Religion and science have two completely different views on things, but the difference between the two does not mean that either one is wrong.
Therefore, IDSA has reasonable guidelines, based on very strict lime diagnostic criteria. However, ILADS has a very strong point that lime can not be diagnosed with official standards.
What if something else is happening? Is not it just lime? Or are we having a real problem to find Raimuspi hete himself?
According to the CDC, "During the 15 year investigation period, 101% reported cases were reported from 9,908 in 1992 to 19,931 in 2006. And why are not they trying to find it?
Now I forget doctors, science, insurance companies, politicians. Please use your common sense. How has it doubled in 15 years? Since they started a food stamping program for Tic, could you bit more people? Or maybe they are being opened with housing assistance in the forest so that hungry mites can chew all the people available now? It is not what I know. For recognition about lime, it should be on the opposite trend. More people are using repellent, more people are avoiding the forest and the government is developing various measures. Is this quiet contagious disease a mystery?
Clearly there is no mite anymore. Obviously, there are probably few tick bites. The only plausible explanation for this rapid growth of lime is improvement of diagnosis. However, if growth is very fast, it means that the ability to diagnose in laboratory tests is very low. Is this on all modern technology, the internet, supercomputer? There is one thing, can it explain the unintelligible nature of lime?
Delft, the Netherlands. Basketbaker maker Antonie van Leeuwenhoek's clever child neighbors, customers, friends are amazed at how hard he is doing. Antonius is working day and night to manufacture his invention lens. However, his friends, neighbors, customers did not know that he was just doing a job. The secret technology to make the lens was very easy, so put the glass rod in the flame, fold it and put a small flame into the flame again. So he made a small glass ball that was actually a high quality lens. He was afraid. If everyone understands how easy it is, he will lose business. But why did he make a lens?
To see what has never been seen - the kingdom of bacteria. What he saw is very attractive, I write to the Royal Society in London as follows. "I believe that the number of these animals at the notches of the human teeth is so numerous that it exceeds the number of men in the kingdom.He was seeing the plague of the teeth, he did not notice He was the first man on the planet to watch the biofilm .. Are you brushing your teeth? What you are actually doing is removing the biofilm from your teeth. What is an innocent monster?
Biofilm is a place where dangerous bacteria are hidden. They produce a labyrinth of polymeric fibers on a suitable surface with small holes and pockets, ie bacterial cavities. They are hiding, they can not be detected by lab tests. It is a place where antibiotics do not attack it. It is just waiting for a better time to go out and hit again. So biofilm is very dangerous. Maybe they are rare in daily practice and are not important? Actually it is the opposite.
Biofilm occurs in 80% of all diseases. And lime is one of them. Lime is not measles, not a cold, it is designed to be infected to another person quickly by losing life. Lime is designed to live long in host - mite, deer and it may be human. That's why I do not know. This is because Lime made a biofilm and hid it! So, sometimes it is not identified by blood test! That is why it often does not respond to antibiotics! Do you prove it?
Dr. Eva Sapi, a professor of cell and molecular biology at the University of New Haven, is conducting cancer research. But suddenly she begins to suffer swelling of the brain. Clinically she had a lime, but her test was negative. That is why she had to start her own research. It was discovered with Dr. McDonald 's that the mites owed other pathogens such as mycoplasma with lime spirote. And they can hide in biofilm! I think that the Revision of Lyme Disease Control of the Association of Infectious Diseases (IDSA) will not talk about such an important discovery by the 2010 recommendation. It was work of an expert who took this into consideration. Or maybe they do not want it? What was the reason behind this? IDSA experts do not seem to appreciate the work of Dr. Sapi and Dr. McDonald. However, ordinary people nominated the Oscar award for the film "under your skin" devoted to Dr. Sapi and Dr. McDonald's work. They must be admired as the fact that lime is hiding in biofilm can explain the failure of treatment. So should you break the biofilm before treating lime?
The conclusion is simple:
1. If you are bitten by ticks and experienced rash, get medical treatment immediately, please come for evaluation. The chances of recovery will be higher.
Even if you are not bitten by a tick, even if there are symptoms suggesting Lyme disease like a rash, most mites are not recognized, so you may benefit from Lyme's assessment.
Let's treat Lyming better by taking antibiotics that hit lime bugs in hiding places they are hiding!
Disclaimer:
The opinion here does not reflect the opinions of the American Medical Association, the FDA or other government agencies. This article is not a medical advice to individuals but is for informational purposes only. In addition, this article is not intended to describe health. Please consult your doctor before making medical judgment.
EmoticonEmoticon