As a disabled attorney, after the case of more than 1,000 successful social security obstacles, I have found that there is one report that can make a difference. What is that report?
First, the authorities believe that the opinion of the treating physician is the most important document of medical records. However, criticism often does not exist. Why is this? Simply, the doctor is involved in the treatment. They are not interested in the problem of legal disability.
Second, the agency does not allow the doctor to make a legal decision in this case. Therefore, if the doctor says the petitioner is "invalid", the agency refuses this "naked" statement. The agency says that this is a legal decision to be made by social security judges.
Third, mere statement that you are "disabled" is not accepted. However, the opinion that shows how doctor's disabilities (from doctors) have an impact on important bodily functions is very important and in some cases may be decent. For example, the opinion of a doctor on whether a claimant can walk, stand or sit is very important. Doctor's opinions such as lifting and bending are also important.
Fourth, experienced disabled attorneys have a series of assessments for your physician. They will be adjusted to your personal obstacle. For example, in the problem of back waist, there is a lumbar spell. This form will question the doctor critical questions on how the back problem would compromise important physical functions such as walking, standing, sitting, lifting, flexing.
Fifth, unlike the "naked" disability statement, this report draws out that the doctor's claim relates to the ability of the claimant's critical work activities. If the doctor's opinion on this issue has been corroborated by the doctor's treatment record for a certain period of time, the social security judge can make this report "critical gravity" of the complainant. Your case.
Sixth, even if other medical evidence does not agree with the doctor's opinion, if the opinion is adequately endorsed by the treating physician's record, the opinion of the treating physician will prevail.
In summary, a single report can win in the case of social security obstacles. However, it must conform to the above criteria: (1) The doctor must be a treating physician. (2) Opinion must show how serious physical function is affected by disability. (3) The opinion is not just to say that the claimant is invalid. (4) The opinion of the doctor must be based on the doctor's treatment record. An experienced social security lawyer can cooperate with the complainant to create this victory report.
EmoticonEmoticon