One of the most common I-601 exemption of exclusive rights for Thai fellows and wives is a judgment that it is not permitted, based on the consular official's estimate that the beneficiary is engaged in prostitution practices It is to abandon the prostitution outcome) has been resolved in the past 10 years.
Believing that waiver was "attractive", many people became confused by the idea of abandoning rights. In fact, abandonment is not attractive. The decision of a US consular officer is unacceptable when making a de facto decision. Therefore, based on the fact, if the consul attained the conclusion that Thai beneficiaries seeking a US visa in the past 10 years are engaged in prostitution practices, that decision will not be issued.
Since exemption is submitted after the consular officer has decided, it is often misunderstood as an opposition. In case of waiver, discoveries under nonpermission grounds (on the premise of engaging in prostitution) have not been disputed. Instead of seeking waiver, for those who are citizens of the US citizen of the US, not being allowed to abstain from wearing will lead to "extreme hardships", so they will seek to qualify for ineligibility and give up on ineligibility I will.
Not all of the exemptions of ineligibility do not require the discovery of extreme hardships. Most importantly, HIV exemption is based on the knowledge that visa holders receive appropriate private health care and compensation in the US that will not come from government sources. At the same time, there are no abandonment for some reasons for disapproval. Two examples of reasons for non-permission without waiver are that fraudulent application to US citizenship for a visa applicant to obtain some kind of benefit in the past, and that the visa beneficiary has a criminal record (Current law, drug notice is exempted if it is less than specified legal prescription amount marijuana).
In order to acquire prostitution abandonment, we recommend that you retain a competent lawyer's service. The requirement to obtain waiver of rights is that if a waiver of rights is refused, the citizen will prove that citizens need to eradicate themselves and live with Thai beneficiaries. It must be shown that this situation will bring "extreme" suffering to US citizens. The hardship must be more than the hardships of every day, and it must rise to a level that exposes American citizens to nearly unbearable circumstances.
Nothing in this article should be used instead of legal advice from a lawyer officially authorized by your law.
EmoticonEmoticon