As telephones and digital companies continue to grow through mergers and acquisitions, the network (neutrality) is an issue in the United States. Telco officials' statements appearing to be monopolized by the telephone network caused a scandal in the independent Internet giants such as Google, eBay, Amazon, etc., created a two-tier Internet system with network owners biased, We will provide the service. In addition, there is concern that the network owner may completely censor or block the content at his own discretion, which may lead to an imbalance in division.
The website hosting directory was decided to consider the impact of this polarized and complicated free speech problem and the recent legal defeat of attempts to advocate the principle of net neutrality.
Information on cable networks has traditionally been crowned under the amendment of Article 1 as vendor's freely regulated content. As the network continually provides the same services and has the same ownership, it is getting harder to justify and manage different rule sets based on infrastructure technology. This creates a problem of which rule should be applied. The FCC reclassified DSL as an information service in 2005. In the same year, the FCC vs. the US Supreme Court supported classification of cable Internet access as an information service.
The recent Senate reform bill was 1529 votes with 152 losses, and the Communication Opportunity Promotion Promotion Act (Cope Act) passed from 321 votes to 101 votes. Several are afraid to make decisions that they will decide on behalf of their customers the websites and services that Internet providers can visit and use. The refusal of the principle of net neutrality was made, among other things, in discussions on the COP Law aimed at facilitating telecommunications companies to provide video services throughout the United States. Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
This vote was the defeat of Google, eBay, Amazon and developed lobbying attractive before the vote in the House of Representatives. Fred Upton, House Communication Subcommittee, pointed out that competition means that consumers can save 30 to 40 dollars in Internet access charges every month. The proposed amendment attempts to add a provision that essentially requires an Internet service company to equally treat all data passing through the cable. This amendment was considered necessary after the FCC abandoned the rules guaranteeing the neutrality of the net.
eBay spokesperson Catherine England commented as follows. eBay supports a net neutrality law that prohibits network operators from replacing powerful open Internet with "# 39; Play to & # 39; & # 39; We forcibly seize content or service providers that refuse to pay new fees. The Internet is a global network based on the principle of openness, potentially anyone can connect with anyone. As we have seen in eBay, PayPal, and Skype, the Internet has the power to create communities on a scale we have never seen before. In the private network to replace the Internet technologically advanced but closed, we end the Internet as we know and reduce the ability of Internet users to reach the world market. Sellers of small businesses rely on their global community and may be most hit by new fees or hierarchical services that prevent existing customers and potential customers from accessing the site. & # 39; & # 39;
Democratic Nancy Pelosi Democratic leader, telecommunications and cable companies can create paid lanes on information super highway, without amendment. It overcomes the center of the free and equal nature of the Internet. & # 39; & # 39; web creator Tim Berners-Lee said at a conference in late May, whether the access supplier could choose the traffic to prioritize during the dark period, & # 39; I will judge.
The revised critics said they would bring unnecessary government regulation. Prior to voting, Internet companies concerned about the effectiveness of the revision proposal supported the proposed amendment concerned concerning the fear that the website would be difficult to reach and to pay for guaranteeing payment. It extends to web users.
In a statement announced by NETCompetition.org, eBay's CEO Meg Whitman sent e-mail to support more than a million members of the auction site's members on the idea of net neutrality. Meanwhile, Google's Eric Schmidt, movie stars like Alyssa Milano, also supported the proposed amendment.
The exact interpretation of "Internet neutrality" is a highly politicized use to describe the contemporary and potential usage of the Internet, as well as proposed government roles in Internet-related trade and communication regulation For the purpose of the controversy. According to Professor Tim Wu of Columbia University Faculty of Law, net neutrality is the term which originally identified the network bias against the provider of a specific class of applications or content or services or against it. According to Mr. Wu's analysis, the Internet should be efforts, not neutral. Referring to the Transmission Control Protocol / Internet Protocol (TCP) bias for real-time applications that support this point, this regular and technical view is embroidered by telecommunications carriers and cable companies that oppose the new regulations.
This term represents the general principle that a network provider must not distinguish people or organizations that provide services over a network. Companies that sell broadband Internet access to consumers should not sign contracts with service providers (such as websites) to provide better Internet access than service providers that do not have such a contract There is none.
In the politics of the United States, network neutrality refers to the scope of the proposed law with various goals related to restricting the fee for data transfer by telecommunications carriers, and call quality and video quality quality of service (QoS ). (Senator Senee, Dorgan, Wyden, sponsored by Congressional Markey, Sensenbrenner et al., Includes this specific QoS ban). The terms of this discussion claim such regulation as one of the current business models for the sale of Internet access to corporate content providers by Internet service providers, such as neutral ones (such as the Internet's largest content provider) I think that the flea market (including telecommunications carriers) is anti-productive and even unconstitutional.
The end of the net neutrality rule also created the creation of an activityist site. Save the Internet & # 39; & # 39; & # 39; that Our Net. A common cause is citing the massive privatization of the media as a reason for concern. Telecommunications companies such as AT, T, Verizon, and others complain to Congress the right to manage Internet connections, research, and related service costs. If a company succeeds in Congress, the Common Cause violates consumer citizenship rights, accesses desired Web content, posts content, without restrictions or restrictions imposed by Internet service providers (ISPs) I am opening the door to using the application.
NETCompeition.org is an electronic forum started to promote strict discussions on the merits of net neutrality legislation and regulation. NETCompetition.org believes that the best way to protect free and independent Internet is not a more open government control of the government, but a free and open competition Broadband broadband communications, cable, wireless company funds We are receiving offer.
According to the information released by the company, Chair Scott Cleland of NETCompetition.org, in a letter to the Senate, revealed that the word of neutrality of Soft Nest is indeed a very degenerate policy position. Mr. Cleland has something called "progressive" but obliging the neutrality of the net that defends its merits is essentially the Internet era of innovation, growth and progress I will finish. The full text of Mr. Cleland's letter can be found at http://www.netcompetition.org/docs/pronetcomp/resources/Net-Neutrality-is-Regressive.pdf.
Scott Cleland is one of the leading engineers analysts and experts in the country related to changes in capital markets, public policy, and technology industry. He is widely respected in industry, government, media and capital markets as an advanced thinker, supporter of free market, authority on future communications.
Is neutrality of the net a modern one? Internet routings & # 39;
In a letter to the senator, Cleland says: & # 39; Neutrality - Raddai is seeking government protection to protect them from technology changes, competition and progress. Comparing with British workers who rioted and destroyed the labor ministry energy-intensive technologies that were concerned about reducing net-neutralists, employment, 19th century Luddites. Mr. Cleland explains the neutrality of the net as a technology model of the stealth depressed age based on an out-of-date and untrusted approach that the government can better manage the technology / economic tradeoffs than the market. Mr. Cleland asks: Is the Internet really the same as any other business or technology that came before? & # 39; & # 39;
According to Mr. Cleland, Net Neutrality will block, deteriorate and hurt US technology progress and explain the diversity of consumer broadband options. Today, the proposal for net neutrality reduces the average speed and responsiveness of the Internet to everyone by breaking the economic incentives to invest to respond to the explosive demand of bandwidth demand. If successful, the neutrality of the network will compromise the economic growth, productivity and international competitiveness of the United States by regulating the natural ability of the market to respond effectively to new demands and risks. & # 39; & # 39;
Philip Graves, an intellectual property patent attorney at Squire, Sanders, Dempsey LLP, Global Law Firm, mentioned the legality of net neutrality, the defeat of revision, the passage of the Cope Act.
Currently, the concept of net neutrality as a limitation on the right to charge content providers to improve the quality of broadband providers
The service provision is not part of the legal environment, but by the defeat of Markey Amendment, the problem seems to be solved in the House. Without the measures of the Senate, broadband providers seem to be more likely to leverage the position as the operator of the Internet Ultra-Expressway by negotiating a phased pricing structure with content providers. Congress and the FCC strictly monitor, despite the consequences of cumbersome fees and restrictions imposed on content providers, as a result of consumer choice and efficiency by price and usage driven innovation, or a decline in consumer choice It is monitored. One thing is certain. This problem is still pending before the House - Congress, two additional bills dealing with net neutrality (communication, consumer choice, broadband expansion in the Senate, and freedom and non discrimination law on the Internet). & # 39; & # 39;
Philip Graves attorneys focus on patents, trademarks and copyright infringement, unfair competition, misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of contract and business violation incorporating software and technology, and other technology related disputes. Mr. Graves, who was elected one of Southern California's super lawyers in 2004, 2005 and 2006, gave a lecture on developments to patents, trademarks and copyright law experts and industry associations, California, Washington, Alaska Association is a member of Bar.
EmoticonEmoticon