The 2012 Criminal Justice Reform Act of Georgia (HB 1176) includes the improvement of the laws of people convicted of crime. In Georgia state, the erasure method has been changed drastically to something completely different from "record limitation". Revocation was a very limited tool before that. This change is effective until July 1, 2013.
Revocation method
Obviously, there are many myths of cities. I say that about one person had called me and called me to destroy myself every week. Unfortunately, under such limited circumstances, few people who actually had qualifications were unable to call me.
Firstly, if we were convicted of a crime arising from the acts of the case, we could not be revoked. For example, if you were arrested on a worse battery and you asked for a battery, you could not revoke the record on arrest or conviction.
You can get disinfected if the deteriorated battery that has been charged is rejected before being accused or pointed out in general. Therefore, if the police arrest you and the DA's office (or lawyer) did not choose prospects (or if not prosecuted) will you be eligible for relief? At this stage, you are "exterminating" only arrest warrants / warrants. This rarely happens, at that time most people are highly admired and they are complaining that never-before-extinction applications will never happen.
I say that 75% of those who actually used the old revocation law are those who have completed some sort of pre-trial conversion program. The old law provided an exception to these individuals in particular. This is one reason why diversion before trial is very popular.
Restrictions on records:
The qualification of "record limit" is greater than the expiration.
Why record limits are better than Expungement
Revocation was limited to records held by GCIC. Sending a request to restrict access to personal records to law enforcement agencies, prisons or detention centers arrested (after being restricted) and court clerks with their jurisdiction due to restrictions on records You can do.
If caught, even if GCIC deals with that record, the prison, the arresting authority and the court clerk will still have a publicly available record that the whole world can see. The private database creates these additional records and removes these collateral records requested by potential employers and other people to restrict the actual GCIC records to more people It may be helpful.
Also, as mentioned above, record restrictions can be further used in FAR.
When the formal fee is disposed of before being charged
In Georgia, prosecution begins, in most cases accusations or accusations occur. Prosecution is a request voted as a true invoice by a grand jury. Essentially, people like the jury were invited to the room, presented the evidence of the prosecution and urged the compromise to vote on a fee list that seems to be doubtful.
If a prosecutor (attorney general or a local prosecutor) has not been billed by a law enforcement agency and it is rejected at the request of the designated agency, if the designated time has passed, that person will be subject to record restrictions I will. That time is about the same as the statutory limit. So, in the case of a misdemeanor, the period is two years. For most felonies, the period is 4 years. In the case of severe violent felony or felony sexual abuse, including victims under 16 years, the period is seven years.
Also, if the case is submitted to the grand jury and the condition "not requested" is made twice, the record limit will be available. The bill means that local lawyers have refused to approve the expenses required by local lawyers.
Case rejected after formal charger
Recording restrictions apply if all charges are canceled or if there is a violation of the nor.
Conditional discharge
Persons who received and completed in 16-13-2 Drug Possession Litigation (Conditional withdrawal of drug crime). This disposition is one of the first criminal treatments that person will not deny the oath. That person must have successfully completed all terms of the probation period.
OCGA § 16-13-2 (Conditional Discharge) is widely prevalent in non-Metro Atlanta County, which does not have a miscarriage marijuana incident, especially a diversion program. The charged plea is convicted, the probationary observation is over and the probation is completed, the ruling is "restarted" and the accusation and conviction are "abandoned".
The problem with the old law was that your Georgia Crime Information Center (GCIC) records still reflect 'OCGA § 16-13-2' next to accusations and arrests. Anyone who knows what they are reading can clearly see that the accused is accusing the crime. However, legally, it did not lead to the administrative influence of typical convictions (suspension of student's license, loss of access to student loans, etc.).
Drug court or mental health court
You can also qualify by successful completion of the drug court or mental health courthouse program. Like OCGA § 16-13-2, complaints are rejected or rejected when an individual completes the drug court program. After that, if five years elapse after cancellation without doing a serious arrest, it will be subject to record restriction.
Normally, the drug court is only available to individuals convicted of multiple serious imprisonment faces. At the time, the accused was usually much more anxious than being remedied, rather than staying outside the prison. Nonetheless, if a person completes the drag coat normally, it will be dismissed and basically stay for five years without problems so you can apply for the record restriction.
Respondents who acquired all claims
Furthermore, if it turns out that a person is tried and it is determined that not all charges have been questioned, there is a possibility that it may be subject to record restriction. This is a big change. Under the old law, the jury did nothing to get arrested / charged from your records that the jury did not commit your sin.
Prisoners can petition the court so that prosecutors do not limit their records within 10 days. In this case, the public prosecutor will (1) prosecutors be prohibited from submitting important evidence to individuals based on legal grounds, so public interest in available information outweighs concern for restrictions (2) Individuals shall bear the same or similar responsibility over the past five years.
The first exception is basically when the defense is given a movement by law enforcement agencies in some way to tighten litigation and deter some of evidence of prosecution. For example, they do illegal searches, murder weapons and contraband are excluded from evidence. Murder weapons are not protected from evidence because the police searched for search warrants and search warrants without consent. There may still be public interest in knowing that this is a violent individual. I think that this exception is freely exploited by angry lawyers who hurt about defeat.
As a second exception, if you are convicted today accusing something, if you are convicted and prosecuted with the same crime four years later, the prosecution will ask the court not to grant record restrictions I can.
The defendant was rejected only by a misdemeanor
If you are accused of one or more felons but only convinced of a misdemeanor or a criminal, you may plead to the upper court arrested within four years to restrict the record.
The language of this subsection is somewhat problematic. The accused can be arrested and convicted in various counties and different states. The arrest record exists in a different county (or state) than a person who sinned (or denied) a misdemeanor. Illegal states follow the laws of Georgia and it is doubtful to 'restrict' arrest records like GCIC. In Georgia province, the defendant must file a petition for the county's upper courts arrested.
In the case before the effective date of the law, it is not clear how this deadline will be applied. The defendant was tried on a battery deteriorated in 2002 and was charged with the request, but if he is convicted by the battery, the defendant will not ask for restrictions on the record, or the court will not be asked to record for four years from the effective date of the law Do you accept? This has not been decided yet.
Finally, the law on this subject does not make sense. It is stipulated that an order (record restriction) will be granted only if the court finds that the misdemeanor charges for the problem do not arise from the same serious fault or negligent transaction or occurrence. This simply makes no sense. It is extremely rare that if the misdemeanor prosecution is part of the original prosecution or accusation, it is not part of the same preliminary trading or occurrence. If there are fewer liabilities included in the misdemeanor compensation, it will be deducted from the same underholding transaction or occurrence. Even though the prosecution has reached an agreement, even if the accused admits filing a lawsuit not related to the prosecution charges, the judge will not accept the same transactions that you found themselves in this incident or It is clear that it is the result of occurrence. First hardship. In fact, the text in paragraph 1 states that you can seek relief only if you find that you are a misdemeanor minor offense. It is beyond my understanding how this awkwardness ends in law.
The only situation I can imagine that this will be applicable is that the police found marijuana in your pocket during your patrol if arrested with a felony warrant. That person will be held liable for possession with the same accusation, but they are completely irrelevant offsets. Therefore, if that person later escapes felony charges and is convicted of "undocumented misdemeanor", they are subject to record restrictions on felony charges.
The defendant sent a conviction, but the ruling reversed the appeal
If a person is convicted, executes the death penalty, appeals a conviction, if the state does not retry the case within two years, it will be subject to record restrictions. The court must decide whether the record limit is appropriate, taking into account the reasons for the cancellation of the conviction, the reason for not being retried, and general public interest in the information being disclosed.
Case dead docking for over 12 months
If an incident is placed on a dead vote for more than 12 months, he / she may petition the court to restrict the record. This relief can not be used if the active arrest warrant is outstanding. When individuals miss the bail and have not taken months or years, cases are often placed on death bills. The law obviously does not reward these individuals by prohibiting record restrictions on their individual records. The court reviews the reasons why a death action has been prosecuted on a ruling that record limits are inappropriate.
Offering youthful criminals
You can file a record restriction if you are rejected by a minor offense of a young age and completed all sentences and have not been arrested for 5 years (except for minor traffic crimes).
The big problem of this provision is the definition of a youthful criminal. A youthful criminal is a person under the age of 21 at conviction. Determining the age at conviction is unfair for several reasons. Mainly, the restriction on "age at conviction" encourages that a "youthful criminal" has been convicted in a hurry, and later purchases the case five years later, "restricting records" There is a possibility to make it available. Cost benefit analysis depends on how important the valuable "record limit" is.
Restrictions on records are not permitted in the following cases:
This law states that restrictions on records are not suitable for conviction as follows:
1) child abuse
2) fascinate children with sneaky purpose
3) Sexual violence by supervisor or person with disciplinary authority
4) Maintain prostitution site
5) pumping
6) Abandonment by compulsion
7) Masturbation for employment
8) Offer massage for nauseality, prostitution etc
9) Sexual battery
10) Crimes against minors prescribed in Article 16, Chapter 12, Section 3, Part 2
11) Theft (Excluding minor offenses by shoplifting)
12) Critical traffic crime as stated in Article 15 of Chapter 6 of Title 40.
In this section, by disturbing traffic regulation devices and railway signs and signals, it is possible to prevent reckless driving, DUI, vehicle homelessness, serious injury by vehicle, severe beating by vehicle, attempts to escape, aggressive driving, murder or serious injury including.
When lawyers engage in negotiations on behalf of customers, we need to consider this promise list. The possibility of record limitation needs to be discussed with the client before entering the petition or before going to trial. If the lawyer becomes out of the record limit, the lawyer has an obligation to tell the client to that effect.
The record limit is the contractual result of the conviction, but the recent US Supreme Court judgment shows that the criminal defense lawyer has an obligation to advise customers on the outcome of the collateral.
There is no record limitation ...
Big Brother always had a way to know what you did, even though it is on the verge of extinction. It is the same as the truth under record restrictions. There is nothing in the law to force anyone to delete, delete, shred or erase records. All such records are passively "restricted". This means that Big Brother is still accessible, but individuals are disconnected.
Also, as mentioned above, restrictions on recording are usually not available until after most convictions. As a result, private databases already do dirty jobs before you qualify. New access to records is limited, but private databases have no legal obligation to delete your records. As a result, employers (or others) using personal background checks are likely to have records based on agriculture they had been doing long before applying for record restrictions.
EmoticonEmoticon