"Technician" who makes prosecutors and criminals free

I am convinced that at some point, or you have heard stories of several murderers and pedophiles for "expertise". And even though I was not all of you, I felt mostly disgusted and angry. To be honest, I feel the same way. The difference from my view and the opinion of other commentators or individuals I have discussed about such a problem is that my anger is not always directed at lawyers. Rather, my concern lies with the "irrational" mistake that law enforcement agencies and, sometimes criminals, become free and regain the offset.

Employees of law enforcement agencies have no simple employment. Police officers and other representatives routinely make difficult and time-sensitive decisions. It is a decision that most of us do not want to ever do. For these reasons, we often sympathize with officers if we find that the division of the second decision is a "wrong" decision. More importantly, the court considers executive officers to seek judgments promptly, and in many cases, various factors are involved. The Supreme Court of the United States paid great attention to officers and sometimes made "reasonable" mistakes. As this is probably not commonly known in general, most of the "technical" hypotheses floating in casual discography will not result in anyone being free.

Meanwhile, there are some unnecessary mistakes that are not valid for officers, and bad people will walk. In 1961, Clark Justice,