Today, of course, I believe imprisonment is progressing more modern than judicial corporal punishment, but it is always better that imprisonment is not true imprisonment. The fact clearly shows that the prison does not restore or deter crime and does not let offenders simply flow out while in prison. The execution of judicial punishment is horrible, usually bloody, but the impact of imprisonment is worse. Prisoners have kept offenders away from families, marriages, employment, friends, communities, churches and have been in a very bad moral environment for several years. Impersonation does not bring the benefits of the example because it is hidden behind the wall of imprisonment. Convictions learn criminal skills, learn criminal skills, participate in gangs, rejoin, fight, crazy, depressed, secularly restrained, adopt sick prison values and methods . In most cases, prisoners do not learn the work and life skills necessary to succeed outside. After being released, more than half will come back to prison.
All the slave systems remaining in history whipped the slaves. Stable countries using judicial corporal punishment are significantly lower today than those with low crime rates today. Historically, corporal punishment has been abolished only because it does not know the decline in social status. For example, Roman citizens could not get whipled like Saint Paul reminded Roman soldiers. In most Western countries, they were shrunk or abolished shortly after civic political equality was achieved. France after the French Revolution, America after the revolution in 1848, America after the American Revolution, and Civil war in America. After Britain abolished it, her crime rate has increased markedly.
Ex-Slaves interviewed as part of a federal writer The project from 1936 to 1938 confirmed the effectiveness of corporate punishment, especially for training young men. Several former slaves said that corporal punishment taught them precious lessons. The women's former slave particularly observed that it is necessary and effective. In the United States we tend to associate blurring with slaves, which was mainly used effectively by General George Washington to discriminate white military. Continental Parliament initially allowed to apply more than 40 eyelashes to Washington, but in 1776 Washington acquired and was authorized to shoot 100 eyelashes from Congress. Just before the battle of Yorktown, Washington bought the authority to rob 500 eyelashes. Thomas Jefferson submitted a "stripe" under the law established in Virginia. In the early years, the United States did not have a large prison.
Corporal punishment is a much better example than prison if it is officially executed. It effectively deters the crime. Fierce pain will fill criminals to avoid pain in the future. Prison boredom does not share the same message. Physical punishment instantly provides opportunities for offenders to change their behavior and participate in law compliance society. Prior to allowing imprisoned monasteries to be reformed, we must finish a clean version of hell first, hinder that improvement, and inherit the skills we need when we are released.
Judicial corporal punishment is much cheaper and time consuming than imprisonment. Imprisonment pays taxpayers food, clothing, evacuation centers, medical expenses, security expenses, labor costs, construction costs and other burdens. The 2.3 million inmates in the United States are essentially the majority of whole-body welfare recipients. Imprisonment removes people from the productive economy, breeds them, and prevents most of them from working productively or efficiently in the private sector. The prison industry is a state business, making products that are normally used only by states. There are few jobs in the prison.
Flogging does not prevent imprisonment. Like prison time, it may be on the head of parolees or probationers. However, corporal punishment is more flexible and flexible. Several whipping occasions may be administered during the time it takes to execute one year imprisonment. Some criminals will want to crime "overcome it" and accept responsibilities sooner.
Judicial corporal punishment does not destroy families such as imprisonment, marriage, the community, caregivers, nor does it increase the welfare costs as much as mass detention.
Our society hates the idea of whipping. It is rarely drawn as precious punishment, but it is often confused with more arbitrary parental punishment. However, the more people know about contemporary imprisonment in the United States, the less they oppose judicial corporal punishment. In many cases, arbitrary and abusive parent corporal punishment does not apply to reasonable use of judicial punishment. We are not doing scientific research on justice judicial corporal punishment. What we have is history ... the knowledge of social disasters due to modern mass detention is increasing.
EmoticonEmoticon