Here, there is a story repeated from the headline. Names and places have been changed to protect people who should have been better.
Imagine this. The old gentleman at the care center was a professional athlete. At the age of 88, the building was still big, heavy and somewhat aggressive. Another old gentleman arrived to live in the same place. Simon was a slender old man, rather it was stately looking academically. Both were diagnosed with dementia of the Alzheimer type. They did not become friends.
In fact, the staff realized that the retired players' building (Bill) seemed to be pleased with bullying other people. He surely will hit Simon. The staff monitored this to not happen. According to the staff's notes, men seemed to tend to fight, but in fact only one of them did it.
By the way, this is often seen in the care situation, staff often happens to be practiced and trained on fair incident reports. Then, one day the building was clearly full of energy for battle. He pierced Simon, defeated the little man and struck his head on the chair. After 10 days, Simon died and it was examined by a local lawyer, but he did not kill the murder charges against Bill markedly.
My observation of aggressive residents should have often asked questions from the original care facility for dementia diagnosis. Consider the background - Attacks in sports are not unusual. Head injuries are not uncommon. Everyday aggressive social behavior is unusual. The care facility should have ensured that Bill could be psychiatric investigated and re-examined the diagnosis before this accident.
Indeed, in my opinion, this reminiscent wisdom is clearly known to us and once the facility knows that he is aggressive, he has complained of disasters to protect this inhabitant It was. I would have informed my family and the state that I could not benefit from a socially based care policy and could pose a danger to my colleagues.
At a minimum, the staff should have turned their attention continuously so that the building can not bully others. In my guess, Bill had sports charisma and the staff feels that he can not challenge his existence.
Let me name the "battle" of the two other residents. Quotation marks are actually always a single resident battle. An old woman strangled her friend in her room and put a plastic bag on her head. No matter what else, it is certainly not a normal dementia behavior. It is a serious psychopathic behavior and made her an entirely inappropriate candidate for a regular care residence.
An 82 - year - old cheerful and bright eyed woman Anita was walking along the corridor as he approached the opposite side to the retired alcohol research professor Andrei. Andrey, which is known to be unpredictable, is the subject of anger of unknown origin, likely approaching his comfort zone, hitting a guy who struck her and kicked her. The report of the incident stated that even if the battle was caused by only one of them, "enter into battle".
My point is that when residents fight, usually only one of them is the founder and the attacker. Often, the staff knows the violent residents and is almost silent. It is the idea of the same type of depilator to accuse the raped girls "seeking it".
I am hoping that the art of forensic investigation on violent cases was taken more seriously. I hope the staff can be fair. I'd like the nursing home to take this particular responsibility more seriously.
If not, the law will come to pass after all.
EmoticonEmoticon