During my first training of hypnotherapy, I strongly emphasized that my instructors should always tell the subjects that they can not apply hypnotherapy contrary to their will. But over the coming decades, this claim has been constantly controversial by knowledgeable authorities. These hypnotists gave the technique after the technique proved that human internal representation, emotional state, behavior can be completely changed without hypnotic knowledge and prior approval. After aggressive clinical practice, education and writing over the years, I witnessed the power that hypnotherapeutic operators are superior to others. Such hospitalization may be contrary to dogma regularly supported by major international organizations, but witnessing unintentional catalepsy of the arm during clinical sessions, or negating that occurs during hypnotism It is to observe hallucinations. It is a performance to fully accept my conclusion.
In this respect the hypnotherapist is not much different than the seller affecting lawyers, surgeons, and even those who regularly use their skills to solve specific situations. But I am still confused when so many people miss the ethical impacts that exist in such encounters. The opportunity for a practitioner to personally operate an unconscious individual is too obvious. This is the reason why there is a peer review entity and license board. They try to enforce boundaries, legal and other ethical considerations so that people do not trust their trade and profession. Such a group emphasizes restrictions, consent, full disclosure, but it is still possible for operators to harm reliable subjects.
The field of clinical hypnotherapy, trade, occupation is accompanied by a lot of neurological debt from social concerns about privacy and unwilling domination of others. It is considerably more involved than the problem of changes in the quality of life of patients / subjects / clients and their potential impact on their families. Yes, there are many areas that can adversely affect human health, personality and human relations. Not only is this the truth of doctors and psychologists, but also many professionals, including teachers, financial advisers, ministers, and coaches, have the ability to influence others' skills. However, hypnotherapists are somewhat different in that they regularly address human consciousness. This means that they have the ability to consciously communicate and manipulate people without conscious. It has all of the meaning of the scientific fiction of an evil scientist who wishes to control another for malicious purposes. Many years ago, in an advanced hypnotherapy training course, we taught how to communicate with others at the same time at different levels. This means that we connect people and lead people without human consent. Here are my concerns.
There is an emerging field that you have to notice as a hypnotherapist understands that lighting my current comments. For many years, the version of the polygraph being used for biofeedback equipment and police work clearly establishes the existence of conscious consciousness. In order to further improve this, there is a new ethical concern, looking at the recent invention of a host of a neurofeedback device that uses live EEG or HEG measurements as the basis for physiological and neurological transformation Just understand the reason. In addition, the recent development of neuroprotective devices designed to support patients suffering from diseases such as ALS, as well as the numerous brain / psychological computer interface devices emerging for consumers, You can recognize that conscious communication is realized. At the same time, ethicists are increasingly questioned about mind control, mind-reading, privacy, side effects, and the impact these problems have on society. When a person wears a device such as an electroencephalographic device and controls a robot via an Internet connection, or when two people can operate conspicuously with similar devices at the same time and communicate intentionally, ethical There are people who start asking questions. (Incidentally, the device I mentioned just is not just the science fiction lover 's heart.
New concerns about the ability of machines to read and respond to predictive thinking should not be new. A talented and capable hypnotherapist always has the ability to work in a predictive environment. For example, a neonatal neurological doctor who has learned the art of pacing and reading, that they are easy tasks for a person to intentionally change the breathing rhythm and match other predictive. No device is required to accomplish this. I've been doing this for centuries. As a clinical hypnotherapist, I will use my skills for conscious communication to communicate and change my subject. Therefore, those surprised by the influence of the newly appearing Brain / Mind computer interface technology need to consider ethical practices in my field. When they do, you will understand that conscious communication will occur within the boundaries of ethics and morality.
Over the past few decades I have been able to work in various fields such as military, financial services, academics. Each had its own concern about ethical limits. I am paying attention to potential abuse, but I am always very impressed with the positive achievement in my hypnotherapy collection. In rare cases, are you asked that a trained hypnotist is accused of cheating? Nevertheless, I am very concerned about the lack of formal ethical training being discussed within the curriculum of major hypnotherapy organizations. In fact, in my efforts in the past, ethics training, or at least a hypnotherapy that does not require risk management, is the only one that is a regular continuing educational requirement related to licensing or re-certification . This has to be changed. It is dishonest and inaccurate to keep teaching beginners to say that we are not manipulating unconsciously to potential customers.
EmoticonEmoticon