Stand up or shut up! Burden of legal proof
Well, let's explain the law the lawyer calls "the burden of evidence".
Many good people are sacrificed to tricky by the hands of legal experts. Lawyers always "counterproduct" the facts or application of the law when the parties claiming facts or laws are always burdened. This applies to plea, motions, presentation of facts, legal claims ... almost all provided by the party requesting the discretion of the court! Do not forget this or do not cheat you on your partner's side! This is particularly vulnerable if you are a professional. But knowing the burden of evidence and knowing how to place a burden on the partner to which it belongs will raise the level of the odds, playfield and force 'oppose' or 'silence' the opponent! Just by forcing the court to "stand up and close" the opponent, it is a great pleasure to win the case by taking a burden of evidence or making a defeat! That is the law ... it can work for you!
If you can sue, there is a burden on the other side.
When the other side records motion, a burden is imposed on the other side.
If the other side claims any type of assertion, the burden of evidence is on the other side. You are not here!
"Burden of proof" is always in the parties claiming assertions, motions, arguments, etc. The burden will never be to those who defend claims, motions, or arguments. Sometimes the burden will "shift". While the burden may shift back and forth for a long time, there is never a party being assertion, not a party doing assertions!
Think about how this applies in case of foreclosure or credit card! Credit lenders claim that the debtor is in debt ... and in too many cases will revert back to prove that the obligor is not paying the debt. Great mistake! To make an assertion by a lender has a burden of proof that the assertion is true, reliable and verifiable. It never falls into this trap that attempts to "disprove" what others are claiming.
You must not be deceived as legal knowledge is insufficient!
A smart litigation officer knows how to move the court. The court charges that the other party (plaintiff and advocate) has a responsibility to prove what is being claimed. A smart litigation officer knows how to force the opponent to submit evidence to the court that is admitted to prove what they are claiming. A smart litigation officer can not "testify" a lawyer to the other party on the other side or submit an affidavit as evidence. A smart litigation officer knows how to stop the legitimate display of the summary (or use it to kick the other side of the tooth). Smart lawsuit win! Do you want to win? If you know only what you learned from your box from a legal counselor of an amateur lawyer, or a weekend seminar administered by a person without legal degrees or court secretary experience, you can not expect to win. Burden the place where it belongs: on the other side! Learn more about the burden of evidence and how to win. Learn how to manage the court! Do not forget your American rights to the court! You can win before the game! You can not imagine how fun it is to make people do the right thing, effectively using the word and formal rules against it! Whatever your opponent is, there are even expensive attorneys, or even corrupt judges ... If you know, you can control!
Please consider the following facts.
1. Almost Process People do not know the rules and do not know how to use them to win (evidence and procedure rules).
2. Almost Process People do not know how to prevent opposing lawyers from placing bets on rules.
3. Almost Process People guess what "admissible evidence" is.
4. Almost Process People do not know how to properly draw their appeals and movements.
5. Almost Process People do not know why it is important for a judge to write a proposed order for signing.
6. Almost Process I do not know why, when and when to cast an effective objection in the court.
7. Almost Process People do not understand the fact that facts are important for winning the case and any facts are not important, but they are only muddy in trivial matter of court confusion.
8. Almost Process People do not know why it is very important to quote the judgment of the Court of Appeal in support of pretrial trials and motion of trials.
9. Almost Process I do not know how to arrange the written copy all You can control the judge in a lawsuit in front of the court.
10. Almost Process People waste valuable court time wastefully and can not understand the needs of people with their problems in order to bring them to the courts and they tend to make bad decisions Process Case.
You need to know how to protect yourself! Pro Se Party who knows the rules, how to use them to protect themselves from court corruption, and they can not escape with crooked lawyers with their smoke and mirror tricks! The difference between the winner and the loser is the fact that the winner knows how to win and the loser is crying!
In case of paying to a lawyer, attorneys should earn commissions and know what to do to win your case. In the absence of a lawyer, please forge what the judge is right and know what to do in order to prevent the other lawyer from doing cheating. This is easy.
Many lawyers are afraid of upsetting judges, so they slide things. They do not object. They are not "guiding" legal judges. They just return and pay an hourly fee and allow customers to lose ... those who pay attorney do not know that they will win yet and are led to massacre by their own lawyers. Sad but true!
EmoticonEmoticon